jong…@myrealbox.com (Jonathan A. Goff) wrote in message <news:1fcb2f45.0211301351.daeb8ea@posting.google.com>…
- — -
> erincss wrote:
> > >Altho I think the world would be ecstatic even just to
> > >have amorphous metal alloys for thick parts.
> > What would some of the properties and benefits of these alloys be?
> Well, you can check out a company currently selling a lower-end bulk
> amorphous alloy.
> http://www.liquidmetal.com
> Bottom line is that they get really high tensile strength compared to
> other metals, they are corrosion resistant, when heated to the right
> temperature range they are injection moldable, they are hard and wear
> resistant when cooled, and they are very elastic.
> The main drawbacks right now are cost $15/lb, and that they quickly lose all
> their strength at even moderately high temperatures.
> Hope that is useful,
> Jon
Since you mention "liquid metal" (aka. amorphous alloys) in connection
with this nanotube composite discussion thread, it makes me wonder
whether nanotubes and amorphous metal alloys couldn’t provide useful
complementarity to each other if they were both combined into a
composite material.
How about a nanotube-reinforced amorphous metal composite?
Think about it — smooth nanotubes have that problem of slipping thru
whatever matrix they are embedded in, thus mitigating their
reinforcement properties, but perhaps the irregular structure of an
amorphous alloy would provide fewer opportunities for slippage.
Clearly functionalization of nanotubes seems to be the main route
being pursued by researchers right now, for adapting nanotubes to
reinforcement applications.
The property of critical minimum length for adequate Van Der Waals
attractive forces has also been expounded on, in regards to making
nanotubes stick to each other and to a surrounding matrix. But what
has also been mentioned is the need to have nanotubes in non-linear
(eg. helical) conformations while embedded in a matrix, so as to
sterically maximize the interfacial forces.
I wonder then, if contorted and other non-linear nanotube
conformations are desirable from this point of view, then what is the
critical minimum nanotube length required to have adequate contorted
conformations of nanotubes? Do you see what I mean here? Becoz
contorted nanotubes (eg. helical) are less likely
to slip thru a surrounding matrix.